Comparison of various FEM approaches in analysis of passive earth pressures

Authors

  • Miroslav Pecník Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava
    Slovakia
  • Viktor Borzovic Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava
    Slovakia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24423/cames.205

Keywords:

abutment, earth pressure, integral bridge, polystyrene

Abstract

Passive earth pressure is an important element in integral bridge design. Due to the integral connection between bridge deck and abutments, the integral bridge expansion and contraction under temperature action causes abutments to move together with the deck.With temperature varying in time, this also causes varying earth pressures acting on the abutments. Abutments are generally being designed to withstand passive earth pressure because it is significantly higher than active earth pressure. However, by using the controlled yielding technique, these pressures can be considerably lowered. For this purpose, a few-centimeters-thick layer of easily compressible material is placed behind abutment, which provides a means to potential material saving. In this article, results from 2D and 3D FEM models of integral abutment are presented. Internal forces obtained in 2D and 3D analysis are compared between themselves, and influence of compressible layer thickness on internal forces is also presented.

References

[1] Pennsylvania Department of Transportation. Design Manual Part 4, April 2015 Edition. https://www.dot.state.pa.us/public/PubsForms/Publications/PUB%2015M.pdf
[2] SOFiSTiK AG. SOFiSTiK Structural Desktop see www.sofistik.com
[3] E.G. Scott. Passive Force on Bridged Abutments and Geofoam Inclusions with Large-Scale Test. Master thesis, Brigham Young University, 2015.
[4] K.M. Rollins, E. Scott, A. Marsh. Geofoam inclusions for reducing passive force on bridge abutments based on large-scale test. Geotechnical Frontiers 2017 GSP 279, pp. 59–68, 2017.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-11

Issue

pp. 253–258

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Pecník, M., & Borzovic, V. (2018). Comparison of various FEM approaches in analysis of passive earth pressures. Computer Assisted Methods in Engineering and Science, 24(4), 253–258. https://doi.org/10.24423/cames.205